Open this photo in gallery:

How much are FIFA World Cup games costing Canadian taxpayers?Ethan Cairns/The Canadian Press

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s business and investing news quiz. Join us each week to test your knowledge of the stories making headlines. Our business reporters come up with the questions, and you can show us what you know.

This week: As the situation worsens in Cuba, a Canadian miner is initiating a steeply discounted sale and a couple of executives made some tone-deaf comments. Take our quiz and find out what happened.


1This was the week when we all started to wonder how much soccer is too much after we learned that Canadian taxpayers are putting up more than $1-billion for the dubious privilege of co-hosting this summer’s World Cup. How much in public funding does that work out to per game?
a. Between $20-million and $50-million
b. Between $50-million and $80-million
c. Between $80-million and $100-million
d. More than $100-million

b. Taxpayers are shelling out about $82-million in funding per game in Canada, according to an analysis released this week by the Parliamentary Budget Officer. What remains unclear is exactly what benefits Canada is getting in return for subsidizing FIFA, the governing body of international football and one of the world’s richest sports organizations. The cities that are most affected have gone out of their way to keep the key documents secret.

2This was also the week when SpaceX announced the largest initial public offering in history. The deal, which could value the entire company at around US$1.75-trillion (yes, that’s with a “t”), highlights the otherworldly ambitions of founder Elon Musk. What are some of the company’s goals?
Check all that applies
a. Establish a human colony on Mars
b. Build data centres in space
c. Develop brain-chip implants
d. Operate a passenger service to the moon

a, b, d. Yep, SpaceX has an audacious list of goals, but even its ambitions don’t stretch to developing brain-chip implants. That’s the key objective for Neuralink, yet another company in Mr. Musk’s sprawling business empire, dubbed the “Muskonomy.”

3Talking of Mr. Musk: It took a jury only two hours this week to rule against the world’s richest man in his case against artificial intelligence pioneer OpenAI and its top executives. The jury decided:
a. Key testimony was unreliable
b. Mr. Musk had not suffered any damages
c. Contract law did not apply to scientific research
d. The suit was filed too late

d. A U.S. federal court dismissed Mr. Musk’s claim that OpenAI’s top executives betrayed a shared vision to remain a non-profit dedicated to developing artificial intelligence for the good of humanity. But the court didn’t come to any grand conclusions. The nine-person jury found that Mr. Musk, who invested millions in OpenAI during its early years, waited too long to file his lawsuit and missed a statutory deadline.

4Bond yields are a key factor in determining everything from mortgage rates to stock prices. This week they went on a tear worldwide, with yields on long-term Government of Canada bonds hitting their highest level in:
a. Two years
b. Eight years
c. 11 years
d. 16 years

d. Long-term Canadian government bond yields touched their highest levels in more than 16 years. Bond yields have been surging around the world because of concerns about rising inflation and uncertainty created by the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran. A sustained move higher in yields could threaten stock prices and push mortgage rates higher.

5What cannot go on indefinitely, according to Prime Minister Mark Carney?
a. A global economy centred on the U.S. and China
b. Free-trade talks with the United States
c. Negotiations over a contentious new pipeline
d. Canada’s supply-management system for milk, chicken and eggs

c. Mr. Carney said this week Ottawa will “adjust to what people want” in regards to a proposed pipeline from Alberta’s oil sands to B.C.’s North Coast, which has rankled environmentalists and some Indigenous leaders. But he said his government doesn’t “want to hear what people are against, we want to hear what they’re for.” And he added a warning: “If things get stalled [in B.C.], we’re going to be spending more time elsewhere in the country because we need to move forward.”

6Tony Wakeham, Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, says he wants to strike a new deal with Quebec on Churchill River power. How old is the existing agreement?
a. 51 years
b. 22 years
c. 10 years
d. 17 months

d. Ever wonder why big projects take so long to build in Canada? This might serve as a good example. Mr. Wakeham, a Conservative, says his government rejects the memorandum of understanding on energy co-operation with Quebec that was signed by his Liberal predecessor in December, 2024. Mind you, he says he doesn’t want to start renegotiating from scratch, but would like to use the existing agreement as the basis for more dialogue.

7Sam Jaber, a businessman appointed to the board of a provincial investment agency by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, appears to have lacked something he claimed to possess. What was he missing?
a. Professional credentials
b. A record of investing success
c. A residence in Alberta
d. The legal right to work in Canada

a. Mr. Jaber owns multiple accounting and tax preparation businesses in Edmonton, and financial statements obtained by The Globe show that he has variously identified himself as a “CPA,” “certified public accountant” and member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. But both Albertan and American professional organizations say he has never been a member.

8It was a week full of tone-deaf executives. What prompted students at the University of Arizona to boo former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt when he delivered a speech at their graduation ceremony?
a. His criticism of smartphones and social media
b. His mention of AI’s rising impact
c. His support of U.S. President Donald Trump
d. His advice on getting a job

b. AI backlash is real and it’s growing. Mr. Schmidt is one of several commencement speakers at recent university graduations to be greeted with jeers and boos when they spoke of artificial intelligence.

9More tone-deaf executives: Bill Winters, chief executive of British bank Standard Chartered, set off a firestorm of criticism when he told investors that he planned to use artificial intelligence to help cut nearly 8,000 jobs. It wasn’t cost-cutting, he said. It was just a matter of replacing:
a. “Surplus employees”
b. “Those who resist the AI revolution”
c. “Lower-value human capital”
d. “Flesh and blood”

c. Mr. Winters is now trying to reassure his employees that his remark was taken out of context. Still, he did say that the bank will cut thousands of jobs over the next four years as it ‌moves to replace “lower-value human capital” with AI and other technology.

10Canadian miner Sherritt International was forced to suspend its operations in Cuba after the United States imposed hefty sanctions on the country. Now Sherritt is nearing a sale, at a hefty discount, to:
a. A member of U.S. President Donald Trump’s family
b. A former Trump administration official
c. A former U.S. ambassador to Cuba
d. A former chief of the CIA

b. Toronto-based Sherritt says it has signed a non-binding share purchase warrant agreement with Gillon Capital LLC that could give Gillon a 55-per-cent ownership stake in the company. Gillon Capital is the investment vehicle of the Washburne family, which includes Ray Washburne, a real estate investor and former Trump administration official.

11Oh, boy. Remember when Republicans were the law-and-order party? U.S. President Donald Trump struck an extraordinary deal this week that shields him from:
a. Any further examination of his taxes
b. Any further need to testify in court
c. Any further challenge to his war in Iran
d. Any further probe into his ties with Russia

a. If you wonder why Mr. Trump’s approval ratings are sagging, consider this a case in point. He sued his own government, then arranged a settlement that creates a nearly US$1.8-billion fund to pay off any of his allies who believe they have been unjustly investigated and prosecuted. On top of that, he extracted an agreement that the U.S. government will permanently drop all tax claims against him and his family. In effect, he’s pre-emptively pardoning himself. How, um, Trumpian.

12To be sure, we all have our tax issues. Some work out better than others. Which celebrity won a €55-million ($88-million) judgment this week in a Spanish tax case?
a. Lionel Messi
b. Penelope Cruz
c. Shakira
d. Bad Bunny

c. Spain’s High Court acquitted Colombian pop star Shakira of tax fraud and overturned a €55-million fine imposed in 2021 by the Spanish tax agency. The judge ruled that authorities had failed to prove that Shakira spent more than 183 days in Spain in 2011, as required by Spanish law to be considered a tax resident in the country.

How well did you do?

Answer all of the questions to see your result
Congratulations, you’re an ace. You could be a Globe editor. Subscribe to our weekday Business Brief newsletter to stay on top of your game.
Good effort. You’re no Rob Carrick but you do know a thing or two about business. Subscribe to our weekday Business Brief newsletter to build up your knowledge.
This wasn’t your week, but that’s okay! We’ll be back next Friday with another business and investing quiz, subscribe to our weekday Business Brief newsletter to prepare.

Follow related authors and topics

Authors and topics you follow will be added to your personal news feed in Following.

Interact with The Globe