A Rio Tinto office building in Perth, Australia. Palliser Capital has proposed unifying Rio Tinto into a single holding company based in Australia, and later split it into two entities.Christine Chen/Reuters
Activist fund Palliser Capital has intensified pressure on Rio Tinto RIO-N to mount a “now or never” counterbid for Teck Resources TECK-B-T, urging the mining giant to unify its dual-listed structure and spin off its base metals business to create a copper powerhouse, a letter to the board seen by Reuters shows.
In the letter dated Oct. 17, Rio shareholder Palliser urged the company to challenge Teck’s agreed merger with Anglo American NGLOY to gain control of a tier-one copper portfolio that combined could produce 1.3 million metric tons a year.
Palliser – which sources close to the matter say holds around a US$400 million stake in the miner, or less than 1 per cent – confirmed the authenticity of the letter, but declined to comment.
Its letter said the deal would diversify Rio beyond iron ore, unlock at least US$800-million in cost synergies, and accelerate copper growth by a decade at lower risk and cost than greenfield expansion, better positioning the miner for the global clean energy transition.
Commenting in response to the letter, Rio Tinto told Reuters it remained focused on “maximizing the value we deliver for shareholders,” and will provide an update on its strategy at its Capital Markets Day in five weeks’ time.
It said the arguments Palliser had put forward over its dual listing had already been extensively debated and rejected by shareholders.
Under Palliser’s plan for a Teck counterbid, Rio, currently dual-listed in London and Sydney, would unify into a single holding company based in Australia, and eventually split into two entities: one centered on copper, aluminum and zinc in Canada, and the other on iron ore in Australia.
The shareholder, which has campaigned for over a year to unify Rio, said in the letter the company’s dual-listed structure makes a stock-based offer for Teck “structurally impossible,” forcing the miner into costly or dilutive alternatives.
“Unification is not optional – it is a prerequisite for any credible strategic combination,” the letter said, urging the board to act swiftly before the Anglo-Teck tie-up is finalized.
Opinion: Wanna bust up the Anglo American-Teck merger? Anglo looks easier to buy than Teck
It said a subsequent split into two entities would unlock trapped value and attract new investors seeking a pure-play copper stock.
“Rio Tinto can table a meaningfully more attractive offer, with an appropriate upfront premium, coupled with the ability for Teck holders to participate in Rio Tinto’s prospective re-rating as FutureMetalsCo is demerged,” it said.
Anglo and Teck agreed to merge without a premium to shareholders, who will vote on the deal on Dec. 9.
A source close to the matter said Palliser has a minor shareholding in the Canadian miner. The fund did not respond to a request for comment on that holding.
At Rio’s 2025 annual general meeting, shareholders overwhelmingly voted against Palliser’s proposal to review the dual-listed structure, siding with the board.
The miner’s board at the time cited tax considerations and said a unified listing would be costly and did not provide the flexibility for big M&A that Palliser had suggested it would.
“Rio Tinto strongly rejects all of the unfounded assertions made by Palliser regarding the quality of analysis represented to shareholders,” Rio said on Monday.