Alberta Premier Danielle Smith repeated her long-held position that Alberta oil should be kept out of discussions of trade retaliation.Darren Calabrese/The Canadian Press
Alberta and Saskatchewan on Wednesday fiercely rejected any suggestion that Ottawa apply export levies on natural resources such as oil and potash in retaliation for steep new U.S. tariffs on Canadian products, as cracks emerge among the country’s leaders over the best way to hit back in the worsening trade war.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and her Saskatchewan counterpart, Scott Moe, in separate press conferences, walked a tightrope on Canada’s battle with the U.S.
They voiced support for Ottawa’s planned dollar-for-dollar countertariff strategy, while simultaneously railing against the idea of using the industries that underpin their economies in the fight.
Prime Minister Mark Carney and his lieutenants, along with the country’s premiers, are trying to project unity after trade talks shattered last Friday and the U.S. imposed 50-per-cent tariffs on $28-billion worth of Canadian goods.
Canada fleshed out its retaliation plans Tuesday, with levies targeting roughly 900 items starting Sept. 8. The federal government also outlined a $7.5-billion support package for Canadian workers and businesses dented by the new American tariffs.
Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe says he doesn't support export tariffs on oil and potash as a measure to hit back against U.S. duties.Darren Calabrese/The Canadian Press
Alberta and Saskatchewan on Wednesday drew red lines around their natural resources, dismissing arguments that products should be used as weapons in the trade dispute.
Ottawa lays out strategy to hit back at $27.6-billion in U.S. products
“What we, as a province, cannot and will not support is any kind of export tariff on our natural resources,” Mr. Moe told reporters in Prince Albert.
Ms. Smith, who has often lobbied against escalating the trade dispute, told reporters Canada would only be harming itself should it impose export tariffs on oil.
“I cannot think of a more disastrous policy decision than cutting off or taxing Alberta’s oil to the United States,” she said in Grande Prairie, Alta. “Doing so would absolutely devastate the Canadian economy.”
Mr. Carney has previously expressed reluctance to apply export taxes to Canadian oil.
Opinion: Canada’s response to Donald Trump is a nation-defining moment
The new 50-per-cent tariffs apply to only 5 per cent of Canada’s exports to the U.S., and the effect on its gross domestic product is relatively small. Royal Bank of Canada pegs the impact at 0.4 per cent of GDP, while Capital Economics estimates the fallout at 0.6 per cent.
Provinces, save for Alberta nor Saskatchewan, have been boycotting U.S. alcohol for roughly a year. However, Mr. Moe on Wednesday said because the U.S. imposed a 50-per-cent tariff on Canadian booze, he will introduce a mirroring levy on American alcohol.
“It will be good for our Saskatchewan producers with domestic and local sales,” he said.
Ms. Smith, however, does not have immediate plans to follow Mr. Moe’s example on alcohol, stating only that she would consider suggestions.
Federal Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, speaking to reporters in Calgary Wednesday morning, declined to address whether Ottawa would lean on natural resources in an attempt to inflict pain on the U.S. in the trade war.
“We don’t negotiate in public,” she said. “We’ve already made important decisions when it comes to countermeasures.”
Ontario Premier Doug Ford insisted that “everything is on the table” as far as cutting off or surcharging electricity or critical minerals exports to the U.S. But he said all provinces, such as Quebec, that send electricity south would have to agree, and that he would follow a “Team Canada” approach. Last year, he briefly imposed a surcharge on Ontario electricity bound for the U.S. but withdrew it after the move attracted the ire of President Donald Trump.
Four takeaways from Canada’s tariff counterpunch
Mr. Ford has also in the past listed Alberta oil and Saskatchewan potash and uranium as potential bargaining chips.
He said Ottawa needs to do more to help his province’s tariff-hit steel and auto sectors weather the trade war, and should exempt them from federally required carbon pricing, while also ending tailpipe emissions standards.
Mr. Ford said he had discussed his demands with Mr. Carney and was “very confident” that the Prime Minister would “correct the issue,” noting U.S. competitors do not face similar carbon pricing policies.
“We can’t put an additional burden on these companies, or they just won’t exist,” he said.
Mr. Ford, Ms. Smith, and Mr. Moe on Wednesday all called for Canadian and American trade negotiators to return to the bargaining table.
But U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the relationship between the two countries is at risk of greater deterioration if Canada makes good on its Sept. 8 countermeasures.
“If there’s further retaliation from the Canadian side, we of course, we’re not going to just sit down and take that,” he said in an interview with CBC News. “Our view is … don’t retaliate. But I know how people are feeling in Canada and what they think. So … it’s unfortunate, but it is what it is.”
He said there are currently no “open channels” of communication between the two sides.
White House adviser Peter Navarro warned on Wednesday that the deal Canada will ultimately strike with the U.S. will be worse than what was offered last week.
“It just is not going to end well for Canada, and I predict that the deal you got, that you turned your nose up, you’re never going to get that deal again,” Mr. Navarro said on C-SPAN. “Whatever you get is going to be less than that.”
Mr. Trump, in an interview with the Glenn Beck Program, repeated his view that Canada doesn’t have anything that the U.S. needs.
“There are a couple of things that would make it a little inconvenient, but we can get them elsewhere. And it’s time to teach Canada you can’t do this any more,” he said.
Mr. Moe, like Ms. Smith, emphasized that he is on board with Canada’s targeted retaliatory tariffs.
“But only when those tariffs are focused and targeted to have a minimal impact on Canadian industries and families – and a larger impact on our trading partner that we want to bring back to the table,” he said.
Mr. Moe faulted the United States for sparking this trade war.
“It was not Canada that got us into this situation,” he said.
“We need to have one goal, with all of the very intentional actions that we take, and that goal has to be for both parties to return to the table.”