Pierre Poilievre speaking on Parliament Hill on Friday. The Conservative Party Leader sent a letter to Carney on Sunday demanding an emergency debate in Parliament on what he called the 'Liberal recession.'Spencer Colby/The Canadian Press
A back-to-back contraction in the Canadian economy has sparked a debate in Ottawa and on Bay Street about whether the country is in a recession, handing political ammunition to opposition critics of the federal government while drawing a skeptical response from economists who say it’s too early to call.
On Friday, Statistics Canada reported that the economy contracted 0.1 per cent on an annualized basis in the first quarter, after a 1-per-cent annualized decline in the fourth quarter of last year.
Two consecutive quarters of falling GDP is sometimes called a “technical recession” – although the term is often dismissed by economists, who tend to look at the depth, breadth and duration of a downturn before using the R-word.
Geopolitical, trade risks pose rising threat to financial stability, Bank of Canada warns
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre jumped on the data, sending a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney on Sunday demanding an emergency debate in Parliament on what he called the “Liberal recession.”
Economists on Bay Street, by contrast, mostly concluded that the numbers don’t amount to a recession – at least not yet.
“Time will ultimately tell, but data on the ground don’t have the markings of a true recession in Canada,” Bank of Montreal senior economist Robert Kavcic wrote in a note to clients on Friday. “Let’s not undersell this softness though – there are legitimate headwinds and structural adjustments dragging down both potential and realized growth in Canada as we head into the summer.”
His sentiment was broadly shared by economists at other banks.
The word “recession” carries significant political weight, as it shapes people’s understanding of the state of the economy and can remind them of past periods of turbulence.
What is clear today is that Canada’s economy effectively stalled through the end of 2025 and beginning of 2026. And it has struggled to make headway over the past year in the face of aggressive U.S. trade policy, contracting in three of the past four quarters.
Washington’s tariffs on cars, metals and wood products are hammering Canadian manufacturers, while uncertainty about the future of the United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement, which comes up for review next month, is smothering business investment.
Canadian households have continued to spend money at a reasonable clip. But the housing market remains in the dumps, employers are wary of hiring and the unemployment rate is at an elevated 6.9 per cent.
“At this point, I would not be ready to call a recession,” said Jeremy Kronick, president and CEO of the C.D. Howe Institute, whose Business Cycle Council is seen as Canada’s unofficial arbiter of recessions.
He said he would likely need to see another quarter of falling GDP and higher unemployment before being comfortable calling a recession.
“But I sound more optimistic by not calling it a recession than I actually am,” he said in an interview. “I see more weakness and uncertainty … and to the extent that even the stuff the government’s doing around the Major Projects Office, that takes time to show up in the data.”
In an environment where Mr. Carney is dominating public-opinion polling, Mr. Poilievre has struggled to gain traction with voters since his 2025 election loss. In recent months, the Conservative Leader has tried to chip away at the Prime Minister’s economic credentials as a former central banker and widely recognized businessman.
Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks to the Economic Club of New York in New York City on Thursday.Jeenah Moon/Reuters
He focused on Friday’s economic data in another effort to land that attack.
Mr. Poilievre argued that around kitchen tables across the country, people already feel like they are in a recession. In his Sunday letter, he pointed to significant job losses, high unemployment and food-bank use to make the case that the GDP number is one point in “an avalanche of proof showing a collapsing economy with fast-rising costs.”
“The recession is real. It means moms with empty stomachs, grocery baskets and bank accounts,” Mr. Poilievre wrote.
Mr. Carney’s office declined to comment Sunday and instead left it to Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne’s office. In a statement, spokesperson John Fragos said Canadians are experiencing the impacts of American tariffs and geopolitical events “in real time.”
“Canadians do not need political theatre right now – they are looking for a plan. That’s exactly what we are delivering – to diversify our trading relationships, supercharge major projects, invest in workers, and drive down costs," Mr. Fragos said.
There is no formal definition of a recession – technical or otherwise.
The C.D. Howe Institute and the National Bureau of Economic Research in the United States make an assessment based on how sharp the contraction is, how long it lasts and how widespread the downturn is throughout different regions and sectors of the economy.
Two quarters of falling GDP can be a useful rule of thumb, but it’s not a hard and fast rule. The Canadian economy only contracted for two months at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the downturn was so extreme, there was little doubt it constituted a recession.
By contrast, the C.D. Howe Institute determined that the two-quarter decline in GDP in 2015, after the drop in global oil prices, did not amount to a recession because the impact was concentrated regionally in Alberta and other oil-producing provinces.
Reticence among economists to say Canada is currently in a recession stems from the size of the GDP contraction in the first quarter, and the dynamics that drove the negative print.
A 0.1-per-cent annualized contraction is small, and close enough to zero that it could be revised up into positive territory. Revisions of several decimal points in either direction are common from Statistics Canada.
“The combined decline in Canadian real GDP over the two negative quarters … was just 0.6 per cent annualized, or barely a scratch in GDP terms,” wrote Mr. Kavcic of BMO.
“Pandemic aside, the average two-quarter decline at the weakest point of the prior three Canadian recessions (2009, 1991, 1982) was 5.3 per cent.”
There was plenty to be concerned about in the Q1 data – which came in well below Bank of Canada and Bay Street predictions – including the fifth consecutive quarterly decline in business investment and a 0.4-per-cent annualized decline in overall “domestic demand.”
Bank of Canada warns of ‘low-hire, low-fire’ job market that complicates rate decisions
At the same time, some of the biggest drivers of the GDP contraction were more idiosyncratic. This included a drop in government spending on weapons systems in the quarter after a surge last year, and a big jump in imports. (When imports exceed exports, it’s subtracted from the GDP tally.)
While overall GDP declined, GDP per person rose an annualized 0.9 per cent in the quarter, as Canada’s population continued to shrink after changes to the country’s immigration system.
“Unprecedented slowing in population growth following unprecedented post-pandemic gains is significantly distorting the typical interpretation of top-line GDP growth,” Nathan Janzen, assistant chief economist at Royal Bank of Canada, wrote in a note to clients.
The Conservatives did not clarify whether they had also sent their request for an emergency debate to the Speaker of the House of Commons – he is the only person who can actually approve such a change to the House schedule.
In addition to publicly making the emergency-debate demand, the Conservatives have also served notice that they may use their opposition day on Tuesday to force a debate on the government’s economic record.