
A Defender drives through the Saudi Arabian desert.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail
Since 1979, the Dakar Rally has been motorsport’s great filter. Born as Paris–Dakar, this event fused navigation with endurance and a taste for the unknown. The venue has shifted over the years, from Africa to South America and now to Saudi Arabia, but the brief has remained the same. Two punishing weeks, thousands of kilometres, a road book handed out close to the start of each stage and terrain that seems actively hostile to progress.
Winning matters, of course; finishing often matters more.

The Defenders take to the Dakar Rally course for the day.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail
That’s the arena Land Rover chose for its factory-run off-road team, fielding three competition versions of the Defender 110 OCTA under a newly tightened production-based ruleset. The class is small this season with just seven entries in total, the three Defenders joined by two Toyota Land Cruiser GR Sports and two Nissan Patrols. But the test is large: prove the road car without hiding behind a prototype.
The stock regulations keep the architecture honest: The body, engine and gearbox remain fundamentally true to the showroom Defender. Thus, the work shifts to what Dakar actively tries to break – so the cooling, component protection, serviceability and the capacity to absorb punishment are given increased focus.

One of the drivers, Sara Price, during a break.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail
In the rally-prepped version of the Defender, indulgences are stripped away, replaced by sheer survivability. The trick 6D Dynamics suspension stays home, the rear seats are deleted and the powertrain is managed for heat and longevity rather than theatre. Software is rewritten for a life lived off-piste; there’s even a setting for those brief seconds when all four tires are off the ground, when the Defender is busy hurtling over the nearest sand dune.
Comfort doesn’t matter in the desert; survival does.
On Jan. 8, the stage we watched, the rally pushed back, right on schedule. Earlier in the day, Stéphane Peterhansel, the event’s 14-time winner, misjudged a line and eased his Defender into a shallow ravine. The vehicle came to rest on its side. Spectators helped tip it upright; he restarted and drove away. Earlier in the rally, his teammate, Sara Price, struck a rock hard enough to collapse a rear suspension arm. Hours were lost, not the rally.
That night in the bivouac, the on-site crew fabricated a revised skid-plate element in the rolling workshop and fitted the update to all three cars before dawn. Dakar isn’t about avoiding problems; it’s about what you do next.

Extensive work must be done to the Defenders to keep them in the race.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail

One of the Defenders is repaired to keep racing.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail
A few days later came another lesson. Peterhansel’s car shed an alternator belt and the time penalty knocked him out of the top three in class. It was a small part with a large consequence, a reminder that momentum evaporates quickly in the desert.
Inside the program, the competitive choice connects directly to the showroom. Jack Lambert, head of technical integration at Defender Rally, frames this effort as a progression from the company’s recent projects. (We’ve met before, in 2019, back when he was overseeing the Jaguar Land Rover’s most recent production-based race car, the Jaguar i-PACE eTrophy.)
“This is the next step for us,” he explains, “We are in this environment and in this race to demonstrate what the road car is capable of doing.”

Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail

Inside the truck that monitors the racing Defenders.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail
The 110 OCTA provides the baseline – power, kinetic suspension, fresh calibrations, a revised layout – but the rally car is tuned to endure, not to impress. In a straight-line, the OCTA would dust the rally version; in the desert, the reverse would also be true.
Choosing the 110 over the smaller 90 was similarly pragmatic. Mark Cameron, managing director for Defender, puts it plainly: “Not only did we test the 90 and the 110, we also tested different powertrains. Given that we were at the table with the [organizing bodies] FIA and the ASO to help set the new rules, we wanted to make sure that we had the best starting point. The 90, with the shorter wheelbase, doesn’t give you the stability with some of the terrain. The 110 was the sweet spot and the OCTA, within the 110, was the best starting point.”
Rally-raid also suits the brand’s personality better than any circuit series. “This isn’t circuit racing, we don’t know where we’re going,” Lambert adds. “We start the stage today, no one here knows the road book. The road book only arrives with the drivers five minutes before they start of the stage. Then they’re taking instructions from the navigator, who has a series of instructions from the road book, to pick their way through the environment, to find waypoints and get to the next bivouac.”

Tires lined up and ready to be used during the rally.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail
It’s adventure plus racing – an honest place to measure durability without brochure gloss.
The brand calculus runs alongside the technical case. Cameron’s long view is straightforward: “We aim to build the brand for the long term.” Today, Defender is “one model with three body styles – 90, 110 and 130.” Over the next five to 10 years, the plan is “a fuller range of products, experiences and services.”
To support this trajectory, he argues for strategic bets, particularly as new rivals arrive that “might look a bit similar to Defender but don’t have the engineering authenticity or credibility.”
There’s a customer thread here as well. Adventure travel is surging, Cameron notes, particularly among high net worth people who really just want to go and see things. What’s learned in the desert could inform owner experiences; an arrive-and-drive path isn’t defined, yet, but rally driver training and smaller events are on the table to be assessed “once the dust has settled.”

Land Rover came to Saudi Arabia to prove what the Defender can do.Mark Hacking/The Globe and Mail
Land Rover has history to draw on. A Range Rover won the inaugural Paris–Dakar in 1979 and again in 1981, back when production lineage could still win outright. The revived production class brings that kind of credibility back within reach – now against rivals that have spent plenty of nights in this same sand. To be sure, although the Defender is not as fast through the dunes as the prototypes vying for the overall win, it looks mighty impressive out there. One of the main reasons? For all the changes, it’s still easily recognizable as a Defender.
However the numbers read when the dust settles, the logic holds. If you say a road car is engineered for the worst road imaginable, this is where you prove it. Strip away excess and certainty and see what survives. Out here, the measure is simple: kilometres completed, problems solved and vehicles that drive away under their own power. On that score, the Defender program has picked the right fight.
They’ve also won the fight – or this round at least. As all the competitors broke the timing barrier to conclude the Dakar Rally on Saturday, the Land Rover team broke open the champagne in celebration of a dream result. For a novice outfit, just finishing this torturous competition is a victory, but the three Defenders also managed to capture first, second and fourth in class.
Lithuanian driver Rokas Baciuska led the charge, alongside navigator Oriol Vidal from Spain. Their Defender was the only one of the three factory-supported vehicles to complete the rally largely unscathed. Second in class went to the American duo of Sara Price and navigator Sean Berriman. Peterhansel recovered to finish fourth in class alongside navigator and fellow Frenchman Michaël Metge. The Land Rover team and its three entrants also combined to capture all 13 stage wins over the course of the two-week rally.
The writer was a guest of the automaker. Content was not subject to approval.