Sam Sivarajan is a keynote speaker, independent wealth management consultant and author of books on investing and decision-making. His forthcoming book explores how to thrive in a world of uncertainty.
The drumbeat of geopolitical uncertainty has grown louder in recent months. Trade wars, military conflicts, and diplomatic standoffs are reshaping the economic landscape. In reaction, the S&P 500 has dropped as much as 9 per cent from its mid-February high.
Whether it’s tariff disputes, widening conflicts in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, or tensions in Asia, investors have to navigate a world where risk can’t be measured by market statistics alone. Daily headlines and rapid-fire tweets cause seemingly constant policy shifts, understandably unsettling investors.
These market reactions aren’t anything new. In just the past decade, we have seen similar responses to Brexit, U.S.-China trade disputes, and COVID-19. Each event triggered significant market movements driven more by fear than fundamental economic changes.
The Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR), developed by economists Dario Caldara and Matteo Iacoviello, assesses these tensions by tracking news-based mentions of geopolitical risks. Their research shows that higher perceived geopolitical risk is associated with lower investment and employment, increased disaster probability, and larger downside risks to GDP growth. All have implications for investors.
Stock markets, by nature, dislike uncertainty. But not all geopolitical events trigger the same response. Analysis by Khaled Rafi and Syed Ali of the University of Turku highlights an important distinction: markets react more strongly to geopolitical threats – anticipated but as-yet-unmaterialized risks – than to actual geopolitical events. Their study finds that the expectation of conflict, whether a trade war escalation or military standoff, creates more persistent market volatility than when events actually unfold.
This pattern can be explained, in part, by loss aversion, a fundamental concept in behavioural economics that shows humans feel the pain of losses roughly twice as intensely as the pleasure of equivalent gains. When facing geopolitical uncertainty, this bias intensifies, causing investors to focus disproportionately on potential dangers rather than opportunities.
This has played out repeatedly during periods of heightened geopolitical anxiety. Leading up to the 2003 Iraq War, the S&P 500 fell 14 per cent as tensions escalated. But once the invasion began in March, 2003, and uncertainty resolved, markets rebounded, gaining 35 per cent over the following year as investor confidence returned. Similarly, during the height of the U.S.-China trade tensions in 2018, the S&P 500 dropped about 7 per cent in October as negotiations faltered. Yet by early 2019, the trade talks resumed and the S&P 500 surged almost 25 per cent over the next 12 months. These events illustrate how markets often react negatively to uncertainty but tend to recover – and even thrive – once geopolitical risks either actually materialize or stabilize.
This mirrors other crisis situations. The initial shock of potential events triggers fear, but markets typically recover once the situation clarifies – not necessarily because the crisis has been averted, but because the uncertainty disappears. It’s not the event itself but the ambiguity surrounding it that seems to drive market reactions.
For investors, this pattern offers important lessons. Knee-jerk reactions to headlines often lead to poor outcomes. Those who panic-sell during uncertainty frequently miss the subsequent recovery, locking in losses rather than riding out volatility. Market dislocations create opportunities for those disciplined enough to look beyond short-term noise.
Some practical strategies for investors include:
- Maintain a diversified portfolio that can weather geopolitical shocks by considering geographical exposure and sector allocations beyond traditional asset class diversification.
- Keep cash reserves to capitalize on market dislocations when others panic.
- Focus on companies with strong fundamentals rather than those sensitive to headlines. Businesses with healthy balance sheets tend to recover more quickly from geopolitical shocks.
- Consider sectors that may benefit during global tension, such as defence, cybersecurity, and certain commodities.
Before making decisions during uncertainty, ask yourself: Am I reacting to headlines rather than fundamental changes? Have similar situations created buying opportunities? Is my portfolio positioned for extended volatility?
Understanding your own behavioural biases is crucial. Are you prone to overreacting to negative news? Do you struggle with investment discipline during turbulence? Being aware of these tendencies helps in developing counteracting strategies.
Ultimately, geopolitical risk is an inherent feature of global investing. While no investor enjoys uncertainty, those who remain disciplined, distinguish between noise and real threats, and maintain a long-term perspective often emerge stronger. The key isn’t to avoid risk entirely, but to ensure adequate compensation for the risks taken.
As legendary investor Benjamin Graham observed, “The intelligent investor is a realist who sells to optimists and buys from pessimists.” In geopolitical uncertainty, the greatest opportunities often emerge when fear peaks and others rush for the exits.
Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox twice a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.