Why Canada’s ETF market is a global outlier – and how we can keep it that way

Open this photo in gallery:

Canada’s exchange-traded fund (ETF) market is frequently described as “crowded.” With more than 1,850 ETFs listed and assets under management (AUM) approaching $740-billion, according to TD Securities Inc., some observers argue the country has reached a saturation point.

That interpretation fundamentally misses the larger story.

What we’re witnessing is not excess, but evolution. Canada’s ETF market has matured into one of the most sophisticated ecosystems in the world – an outlier built on innovation, distinct investor demand, and a regulatory framework that has allowed new ideas to flourish before they appear elsewhere.

Canadian ETFs manage approximately $739-billion in AUM, buoyed by record-breaking inflows last year of more than $125-billion, according to TD Securities. These inflows coincided with strong market performance over the last three years, yet unfolded despite geopolitical uncertainty and market volatility – conditions that typically suppress asset accumulation.

The U.S. ETF market is almost 20 times the size of the Canadian ETF market, with approximately US$13.9-trillion in AUM, according TD Securities. However, Canada’s growth rate and product diversity are exceptional relative to its size.

The expansion has been driven not by speculative frenzy, but by utility. Trading volumes have notably outpaced market appreciation, confirming that investors are using these products as tools for income and risk management rather than just passive buy-and-hold vehicles.

Innovation as a structural advantage

Canada’s leadership is no accident; it’s a legacy. The country launched the world’s first ETF in 1990, and that first-mover culture continues to define the market.

Canadian issuers have consistently been global pioneers, often launching products ahead of their U.S. counterparts. Key examples include the early adoption of covered-call strategies and the launch of spot crypto ETFs long before U.S. approval.

These are not niche experiments; “yield enhanced” strategies alone attracted more than $10.4-billion in inflows last year, according to TD Securities, while alternative strategies remain a key differentiator for investors seeking cash flow in a complex macro environment.

Canadian investors behave differently than their U.S. counterparts. While ETF flows in the U.S. remain concentrated heavily in broad market beta (growth), Canadian investors allocate a significantly higher share of assets to income-oriented strategies.

This divergence is structural. Relative to market size, Canadians use option-based income strategies at a rate that dwarfs that of the U.S. This preference has turned Canada into a global testing ground for sophisticated income solutions.

The regulatory advantage: active management

Perhaps the most critical and debated driver of this success is Canada’s regulatory framework for active ETFs.

Historically, the U.S. model required most active ETFs to disclose holdings daily, a transparency standard that kept many active managers on the sidelines for fear of “front-running” or intellectual property theft. While the U.S. has recently seen growth in this space, active strategies still command only 11.2 per cent of the market share, according to TD Securities.

In contrast, Canada’s securities regulation has long struck a better balance. It permits active ETF managers to disclose holdings with a delay, aligning them with mutual fund standards. That allows asset managers to execute genuine, high-conviction strategies without showing their hand in real-time. The result? Discretionary actively managed ETFs now represent roughly 32.6 per cent of Canadian ETF AUM – almost triple the U.S. rate.

Maintaining the lead

To preserve this leadership, Canada must focus on three priorities:

1. Address the tax efficiency challenge: Recent changes to the “allocation to redeemers” (ATR) tax framework have introduced friction for Canadian ETFs. The industry must work with policy-makers to ensure that tax integrity rules do not trigger double taxation inadvertently or disadvantage domestic funds relative to U.S. alternatives.
2. Strengthen domestic capital formation: A vibrant ETF ecosystem depends on a healthy public market. With too many companies delisting or looking south, we should prioritize policies that encourage listings and liquidity on Canadian exchanges. An innovative ETF market can’t thrive indefinitely without a robust universe of underlying Canadian securities.
3. Embrace the new distribution landscape: Digital platforms and financial influencers are reshaping how investors discover products. Rather than viewing this as a threat, the industry should view it as an accelerant. Supporting responsible financial education in these spaces will be critical to bringing the next generation of investors into the market.

Canada’s ETF market is not experiencing a bubble; it’s maturing.

If policy-makers continue to refine rather than restrict the conditions that enabled this growth, Canada will not merely keep pace with global peers. It will continue to set the standard.

Karl Cheong is executive vice-president, head of ETFs at Ninepoint Partners LP in Toronto.