Skip to main content

Analysts Offer Insights on Financial Companies: AFLAC (AFL) and Accelerant Holdings Class A (ARX)

Tipranks - Fri Mar 20, 8:54AM CDT

There’s a lot to be optimistic about in the Financial sector as 2 analysts just weighed in on AFLAC (AFL) and Accelerant Holdings Class A (ARX) with bullish sentiments.

Claim 70% Off TipRanks Premium

AFLAC (AFL)

Raymond James analyst Wilma Burdis maintained a Buy rating on AFLAC today and set a price target of $119.00. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $108.33.

Burdis has an average return of 16.1% when recommending AFLAC. ;'>

According to TipRanks.com, Burdis is ranked #3674 out of 12128 analysts.

The word on The Street in general, suggests a Hold analyst consensus rating for AFLAC with a $112.86 average price target.

See the top stocks recommended by analysts >>

Accelerant Holdings Class A (ARX)

Raymond James analyst Gregory Peters maintained a Buy rating on Accelerant Holdings Class A today and set a price target of $13.00. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $11.54, close to its 52-week low of $9.18.

According to TipRanks.com, Peters is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 9.2% and a 65.8% success rate. Peters covers the Financial sector, focusing on stocks such as Neptune Insurance Holdings, Inc. Class A, Marsh & McLennan Companies, and Baldwin Insurance Group. ;'>

Accelerant Holdings Class A has an analyst consensus of Moderate Buy, with a price target consensus of $17.21, implying a 47.6% upside from current levels. In a report issued on March 16, Piper Sandler also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a $13.00 price target.

Read More on AFL:

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.