Skip to main content

Analysts’ Opinions Are Mixed on These Utilities Stocks: CMS Energy (CMS) and Portland GE (POR)

Tipranks - Tue Feb 10, 6:42AM CST

Companies in the Utilities sector have received a lot of coverage today as analysts weigh in on CMS Energy (CMSResearch Report) and Portland GE (PORResearch Report).

Valentine's Day Sale - 70% Off

CMS Energy (CMS)

In a report issued on February 5, James Thalacker from BMO Capital reiterated a Buy rating on CMS Energy, with a price target of $80.00. The company’s shares closed last Friday at $72.84, close to its 52-week high of $75.06.

According to TipRanks.com, Thalacker is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 13.9% and a 68.2% success rate. Thalacker covers the Utilities sector, focusing on stocks such as Constellation Energy Corporation, Centerpoint Energy, and WEC Energy Group. ;'>

Currently, the analyst consensus on CMS Energy is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $79.78, implying an 8.5% upside from current levels. In a report issued on February 6, TipRanks – DeepSeek also upgraded the stock to Buy with a $83.00 price target.

See Insiders’ Hot Stocks on TipRanks >>

Portland GE (POR)

In a report released today, Shahriar Pourreza from Wells Fargo maintained a Hold rating on Portland GE, with a price target of $49.00. The company’s shares closed last Friday at $50.65.

According to TipRanks.com, Pourreza is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 9.0% and a 67.7% success rate. Pourreza covers the Utilities sector, focusing on stocks such as Constellation Energy Corporation, Public Service Enterprise, and American Electric Power. ;'>

Portland GE has an analyst consensus of Hold, with a price target consensus of $49.60.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.