Skip to main content

Analysts Are Neutral on These Utilities Stocks: Stem Inc (STEM), FirstEnergy (FE)

Tipranks - Sat Mar 7, 4:54AM CST

Analysts fell to the sidelines weighing in on Stem Inc (STEMResearch Report) and FirstEnergy (FEResearch Report) with neutral ratings, indicating that the experts are neither bullish nor bearish on the stocks.

Claim 70% Off TipRanks Premium

Stem Inc (STEM)

Barclays analyst Christine Cho CFA maintained a Hold rating on Stem Inc today and set a price target of $18.00. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $12.18.

According to TipRanks.com, CFA is ranked #9104 out of 12128 analysts.

Currently, the analyst consensus on Stem Inc is a Hold with an average price target of $15.00, representing a 23.2% upside. In a report released yesterday, TipRanks – xAI also reiterated a Hold rating on the stock with a $10.00 price target.

See today’s best-performing stocks on TipRanks >>

FirstEnergy (FE)

Bank of America Securities analyst Ross Fowler reiterated a Hold rating on FirstEnergy yesterday. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $50.32.

According to TipRanks.com, Fowler is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 8.0% and a 69.0% success rate. Fowler covers the Utilities sector, focusing on stocks such as Constellation Energy Corporation, Public Service Enterprise, and California Water Service. ;'>

The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for FirstEnergy with a $51.00 average price target, which is a 1.3% upside from current levels. In a report issued on February 19, Mizuho Securities also maintained a Hold rating on the stock with a $51.00 price target.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.