Skip to main content

Analysts Offer Insights on Consumer Cyclical Companies: Canada Goose Holdings (GOOS) and Valvoline (VVV)

Tipranks - Mon Feb 2, 11:44PM CST

Analysts have been eager to weigh in on the Consumer Cyclical sector with new ratings on Canada Goose Holdings (GOOSResearch Report) and Valvoline (VVVResearch Report).

Claim 50% Off TipRanks Premium

Canada Goose Holdings (GOOS)

In a report released yesterday, Sam Poser from Williams Trading maintained a Sell rating on Canada Goose Holdings, with a price target of C$14.00. The company’s shares closed last Friday at $12.16.

According to TipRanks.com, Poser is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 17.2% and a 51.8% success rate. Poser covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Birkenstock Holding plc, Dick’s Sporting Goods, and Wolverine World Wide. ;'>

Canada Goose Holdings has an analyst consensus of Hold, with a price target consensus of $14.71.

See Insiders’ Hot Stocks on TipRanks >>

Valvoline (VVV)

In a report released today, Scott Stember from Roth MKM reiterated a Buy rating on Valvoline, with a price target of $42.00. The company’s shares closed last Friday at $32.72.

According to TipRanks.com, Stember is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 10.7% and a 59.9% success rate. Stember covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Standard Motor Products, Camping World Holdings, and Winnebago Industries. ;'>

Currently, the analyst consensus on Valvoline is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $38.46, representing a 18.6% upside. In a report issued on January 29, TipRanks – Google also upgraded the stock to Buy with a $36.00 price target.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.