Skip to main content

Analysts’ Opinions Are Mixed on These Real Estate Stocks: Adamas Trust (ADAM) and Invitation Homes (INVH)

Tipranks - Sat Feb 21, 4:36AM CST

Companies in the Real Estate sector have received a lot of coverage today as analysts weigh in on Adamas Trust (ADAMResearch Report) and Invitation Homes (INVHResearch Report).

President's Day Sale - 70% Off

Adamas Trust (ADAM)

In a report released yesterday, Bose George from KBW maintained a Hold rating on Adamas Trust, with a price target of $9.00. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $8.29.

According to TipRanks.com, George is a top 25 analyst with an average return of 15.6% and a 79.5% success rate. George covers the Financial sector, focusing on stocks such as Stewart Information Services, Fidelity National Financial, and First American Financial. ;'>

Currently, the analyst consensus on Adamas Trust is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $9.00.

See the top stocks recommended by analysts >>

Invitation Homes (INVH)

KeyBanc analyst Austin Wurschmidt maintained a Buy rating on Invitation Homes today. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $25.68.

According to TipRanks.com, Wurschmidt is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 6.9% and a 56.3% success rate. Wurschmidt covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as National Health Investors, Medical Properties Trust, and Independence Realty. ;'>

Invitation Homes has an analyst consensus of Moderate Buy, with a price target consensus of $31.84, a 19.4% upside from current levels. In a report released yesterday, Evercore ISI also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a $33.00 price target.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.