Skip to main content

Analysts Have Conflicting Sentiments on These Energy Companies: Tenaris SA (TS) and SM Energy (SM)

Tipranks - Fri Feb 20, 7:00AM CST

Analysts have been eager to weigh in on the Energy sector with new ratings on Tenaris SA (TSResearch Report) and SM Energy (SMResearch Report).

President's Day Sale - 70% Off

Tenaris SA (TS)

In a report released today, Guillaume Delaby from Bernstein maintained a Buy rating on Tenaris SA, with a price target of $49.00. The company’s shares closed last Wednesday at $49.73.

Delaby has an average return of 34.0% when recommending Tenaris SA. ;'>

According to TipRanks.com, Delaby is ranked #1489 out of 12109 analysts.

Tenaris SA has an analyst consensus of Hold, with a price target consensus of $44.32, which is a -11.6% downside from current levels. In a report issued on February 4, TipRanks – DeepSeek also upgraded the stock to Buy with a $50.00 price target.

See Insiders’ Hot Stocks on TipRanks >>

SM Energy (SM)

In a report released yesterday, Phillip Jungwirth from BMO Capital maintained a Hold rating on SM Energy, with a price target of $24.00. The company’s shares closed last Wednesday at $23.40.

According to TipRanks.com, Jungwirth is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 5.7% and a 51.6% success rate. Jungwirth covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Crescent Energy Company Class A, Flowco Holdings Inc Class A, and Weatherford International. ;'>

Currently, the analyst consensus on SM Energy is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $29.78, which is a 33.8% upside from current levels. In a report issued on February 13, Siebert Williams Shank & Co also maintained a Hold rating on the stock with a $23.00 price target.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.