Skip to main content

Analysts Are Bullish on These Energy Stocks: Tenaris SA (TS), Cactus (WHD)

Tipranks - Fri May 2, 2025

There’s a lot to be optimistic about in the Energy sector as 2 analysts just weighed in on Tenaris SA (TSResearch Report) and Cactus (WHDResearch Report) with bullish sentiments.

Protect Your Portfolio Against Market Uncertainty

Tenaris SA (TS)

TD Cowen analyst Marc Bianchi maintained a Buy rating on Tenaris SA today. The company’s shares closed last Wednesday at $33.29.

According to TipRanks.com, Bianchi has currently 0 stars on a ranking scale of 0-5 stars, with an average return of -4.3% and a 37.2% success rate. Bianchi covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Oceaneering International, Liberty Oilfield Services, and Baker Hughes Company. ;'>

Currently, the analyst consensus on Tenaris SA is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $43.40, representing a 30.4% upside. In a report released today, Piper Sandler also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a $50.00 price target.

See Insiders’ Hot Stocks on TipRanks >>

Cactus (WHD)

Stifel Nicolaus analyst Stephen Gengaro maintained a Buy rating on Cactus today and set a price target of $61.00. The company’s shares closed last Wednesday at $37.94.

According to TipRanks.com, Gengaro is a 1-star analyst with an average return of -2.3% and a 34.5% success rate. Gengaro covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Liberty Oilfield Services, and Oil States International. ;'>

The word on The Street in general, suggests a Hold analyst consensus rating for Cactus with a $54.25 average price target.

Read More on TS:

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.