Skip to main content

Analysts Are Neutral on Top Consumer Cyclical Stocks: 1-800 Flowers (FLWS), Wolverine World Wide (WWW)

Tipranks - Fri Feb 27, 10:12AM CST

Analysts fell to the sidelines weighing in on 1-800 Flowers (FLWSResearch Report) and Wolverine World Wide (WWWResearch Report) with neutral ratings, indicating that the experts are neither bullish nor bearish on the stocks.

Claim 50% Off TipRanks Premium

1-800 Flowers (FLWS)

Noble Financial analyst Michael Kupinski maintained a Hold rating on 1-800 Flowers today. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $3.56.

According to TipRanks.com, Kupinski is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 10.0% and a 37.1% success rate. Kupinski covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Alliance Entertainment Holding, E. W. Scripps Company Class A, and Direct Digital Holdings. ;'>

1-800 Flowers has an analyst consensus of Hold.

See the top stocks recommended by analysts >>

Wolverine World Wide (WWW)

In a report released today, Dana Telsey from Telsey Advisory maintained a Hold rating on Wolverine World Wide, with a price target of $18.00. The company’s shares closed last Thursday at $20.16.

According to TipRanks.com, Telsey is a 3-star analyst with an average return of 1.8% and a 42.2% success rate. Telsey covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Birkenstock Holding plc, G-III Apparel Group, and Lululemon Athletica. ;'>

Currently, the analyst consensus on Wolverine World Wide is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $20.17, a -3.0% downside from current levels. In a report issued on February 20, Piper Sandler also maintained a Hold rating on the stock with a $16.00 price target.

Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

This article contains syndicated content. We have not reviewed, approved, or endorsed the content, and may receive compensation for placement of the content on this site. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer.