The EU should muster the courage to offer Canada a much deeper economic, political and strategic partnership, presenting itself as an attractive alternative to what America has become, writes Philippe Legrain.Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press
Philippe Legrain, a former economic adviser to the president of the European Commission, is a visiting senior fellow at the London School of Economics’ European Institute and the author of Them and Us: How Immigrants and Locals Can Thrive Together.
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s widely acclaimed speech at Davos earlier this year remains the talk of diplomats worldwide. Mr. Carney argued that middle powers must act together to avoid becoming victims of predatory superpowers, and he has lived by his words, duly standing with his European allies as U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to invade Greenland, a Danish territory.
Mr. Carney’s government has also continued to provide military and financial aid to war-torn Ukraine.
Yet now that Mr. Trump has launched another rapidly escalating trade war against Canada, traditionally the United States’ closest economic partner, European leaders have been conspicuously silent. They are making a big mistake. Solidarity must be a two-way street.
In addition to threatening European sovereignty, Mr. Trump has repeatedly asserted that Canada ought to become the 51st U.S. state. Mr. Trump wants to make Canada an economic vassal by limiting its ability to strike alternative deals with other partners such as the EU, and he is threatening ever-escalating tariffs to achieve his ends.
Canada cannot afford to lose this fight. With the stakes so high, the EU should muster the courage to offer Canada a much deeper economic, political and strategic partnership, presenting itself as an attractive alternative to what America has become.
Consider the powerful message that the EU could send if it offered Canada an enhanced zero-tariff trade deal. Think of all the ways that Canada and Europe could collaborate more closely on Arctic security, energy and critical minerals.
One obstacle to bold EU action is cowardice. Despite ample evidence that Mr. Trump does not respect appeasers, European leaders are still wary of sticking their necks out. Yet when countries stand up to Mr. Trump’s bullying, he tends to back down. If middle powers can come together, they will have more options and greater leverage to negotiate with superpowers.
At the very least, a generous offer from the EU would strengthen Canada’s current position vis-à-vis the Trump administration. The EU could easily be Mr. Trump’s next target. Does Europe want to endure more bullying alone?
Another hurdle, conversely, is arrogance. In the pre-Trump era, when the U.S.-led rules-based international order was still intact, the EU considered itself a superpower, at least in economic terms. But in the new world of might makes right, the EU must acknowledge that for now it lacks the political unity, military muscle, geopolitical leverage, economic dynamism and technological prowess to rival the U.S. or China. It is more like Canada than it thinks.
In fact, the EU is the biggest of the middle powers. It is not, like the U.S. and China, an apex predator, which means that it is potential prey. Once European policy makers accept this reality, perhaps they will be more open to collaborating with like-minded powers to address their shared vulnerabilities.
Opinion: How Canada can best respond to threats from the United States
A third obstacle is institutional rigidity. As the largest of the middle powers, the EU has the most to gain from closer collaboration with a wide range of partners; indeed, it could be the anchor for overlapping “coalitions of the willing.” But to play that role, it needs to move beyond its overly rigid and trade-centric model of co-operation, where deep economic integration is reserved for countries that aspire to join the EU or agree to follow its rules wholesale.
Europe should instead embrace more flexible and wide-ranging forms of co-operation that are better suited to a messy, disordered world. These could involve varying combinations of deeper economic integration, closer political co-operation, and broader strategic alliances.
More broadly, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has floated the idea of the EU linking up with the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Together, the EU and CPTPP account for nearly one-third of the world economy, a greater share than that of the U.S. or China. Talks have already begun on a digital trade deal, with parties pledging not to impose protectionist tariffs on one another; but progress remains slow.
As Mr. Carney rightly put it earlier this year, “In a world of great power rivalry, the countries in between have a choice – compete with each other for favour, or combine to create a third path with impact.” Canada has made its choice. This is the moment for the EU to support it.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2026.