Supporters of Tibetan activist Lobga Rangzen gather outside the U.N. in New York City, on July 9.Ed Ou/Reuters
Brahma Chellaney, a professor emeritus of strategic studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research and a fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin, is the author of Water, Peace, and War: Confronting the Global Water Crisis
The self-immolation of exiled Tibetan activist Lobga Rangzen outside United Nations headquarters in New York on July 2 was not an expression of personal despair. It was a desperate attempt to jolt the world out of its growing indifference to one of the most important international issues of our time: Tibet’s systematic erasure.
China occupied then-autonomous Tibet shortly after the founding of the People’s Republic. The occupation is often viewed primarily through the prism of human rights, and for good reason. But it should also be understood as an effort to lay claim to one of Asia’s most valuable geopolitical assets: the vast, resource-rich Tibetan Plateau dominates the Himalayas, contains the headwaters of Asia’s great rivers, and overlooks South, Central and Southeast Asia.
In recent decades, China has invested heavily in the Plateau while relying on surveillance, coercion and security forces to suppress resistance. But physical control of Tibet is not enough for Chinese President Xi Jinping. He wants complete and lasting control over the entire Tibetan Plateau.
The best way to achieve that, Mr. Xi has concluded, is by erasing the identity of the people who inhabit it.
To this end, China has steadily expanded its system of state-run boarding schools. China portrays these “residential schools” as engines of development. In fact, the curriculum is designed to erase children’s Tibetan identity and replace it with allegiance to the Chinese state.
United Nations experts report that more than one million Tibetan children aged six to 18 – about 78 per cent of the total – attend these schools. They are separated from their families and cultures, taught in Mandarin, exposed only to Han culture and experiences, and conditioned to view their own culture, religion, and language as inferior. In other words, China is raising a generation of Tibetans to assimilate to Chinese culture –and lose their own.
A memorial for Tibetan activist Lobga Rangzen outside the U.N. in New York City is pictured on July 9.Ed Ou/Reuters
China has also taken other steps to erase Tibet. Since late 2023, China has systematically replaced “Tibet” with “Xizang” as the official English-language designation in its government documents, diplomatic communications and state media. The name derives from the Manchu Qing dynasty’s imperial terminology for Tibet. Its adoption is intended to buttress China’s claim that Tibet is not a distinct historical entity, but merely an appendage of China.
The international community is making this erasure all too easy. Some museums, universities and research institutions outside China have accepted this imperial renaming.
Now, China is taking this effort to the next level. On July 1, a sweeping new “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law took effect, codifying Mr. Xi’s drive to force the assimilation of Tibetans and other ethnic minorities to a single state-defined Chinese identity centred on loyalty to the Communist Party. By criminalizing broadly defined threats to “ethnic unity,” the legislation amounts to yet another weapon with which China can intimidate Tibetan activists, scholars, and diaspora communities. Families in Tibet already face retaliation for the activities of relatives overseas.
The timing of the new law is not a coincidence. The Tibet question has gradually faded from the global agenda in recent years. This partly reflects the international community’s preoccupation with the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, tensions over Taiwan and acute global economic uncertainty. But many governments are also reluctant to jeopardize their relations with China. So, while they rightly condemn cultural destruction elsewhere, they largely ignore the destruction of Tibetan identity.
But this calculation overlooks an inescapable reality: China’s assault on Tibetan identity is inseparable from its great-power ambitions. A permanently assimilated Tibet would consolidate China’s military advantage over the Himalayan piedmont, strengthen its control over Asia’s water resources, secure immense deposits of strategic minerals and remove what China perceives as the last potential source of political resistance in the region. Such a China would be better equipped – and significantly emboldened – to assert more authority beyond its borders.
The international response need not be extreme. Democratic governments should sanction officials responsible for the forced-assimilation campaign, reject official pressure to refer to the region as Xizang and expand support for Tibetan educational and cultural institutions in exile. These modest but meaningful steps would help to preserve one of Asia’s oldest civilizations while making clear that cultural erasure cannot become an accepted instrument of statecraft.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2026.