
Separatist leader Mitch Sylvestre at a rally in front of Elections Alberta's headquarters in Edmonton earlier in May. Mr. Sylvestre panned the Premier's referendum plan.HENRY MARKEN/AFP/Getty Images
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s plan to put a convoluted question about secession to a provincewide vote in the fall has united her detractors on the left and right flanks of the political spectrum in anger.
Naheed Nenshi, the Alberta New Democratic Party Leader, on Thursday evening pledged a spring and summer campaign aimed at Ms. Smith and Alberta’s independence movement. Mitch Sylvestre, a prominent leader of the separatist campaign, said he felt the Premier betrayed him and his allies.
And two First Nations that fought to thwart a citizen-led effort to get independence on a referendum ballot said they will not back down after Thursday’s announcement.
With independence activists feeling cheated by Ms. Smith’s secession question, federalists raging that separation is on the ballot at all, and some First Nations chiefs calling for others to join their fight in defence of the rule of law, Albertans are in for months of raucous – and potentially destabilizing – politicking and legal wrangling.
National unity is under stress from a number of quarters. Sovereigntists in Quebec are eyeing their own potential referendum; British Columbia is complaining about Alberta’s new energy pact with Ottawa; and the trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump is taking a bite out of the economy.
Mr. Nenshi, in a video posted to social media Thursday evening, blamed Ms. Smith for putting Alberta’s place in Confederation at risk for the first time in history.
“The Premier has chosen to put the future of our country behind her own political expediency,” he said. “We are going to make sure Danielle Smith and the separatists get the defeat they so richly deserve.”
Ms. Smith previously scheduled a referendum for Oct. 19, with the ballot’s nine questions largely centred on immigration. During a television address Thursday evening, she pledged a 10th question: “Should Alberta remain a province of Canada or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?”
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced on Thursday the province would hold a vote on Alberta's future within Canada this fall.HO/The Canadian Press
The muddy wording means voters will choose a preferred option rather than vote yes or no. The second option – which would spur the provincial government to do the legal legwork necessary to hold a second, binding independence referendum – would not provide immediate relief for separatists itching for Alberta to leave the Canadian fold.
And so, Mr. Sylvestre, the United Conservative Party constituency president who led the separatist campaign to collect signatures in an effort to force a secession referendum, said Ms. Smith failed him.
“I feel duped,” he said, minutes after the Premier finished her television address.
Poilievre vows to make the case for unity to Albertans, but not ‘asymmetric federalism’
Anger and frustration burbled throughout the independence movement Thursday night, with would-be separatists plotting to remove Ms. Smith as the UCP’s leader, a fight that would rattle Alberta’s politics even if it proved unsuccessful.
Separatist activists renewed calls for like-minded Albertans to buy memberships in the UCP, so they can throw their weight around on constituency association boards. If they control enough local boards, they can trigger a special general meeting and force a leadership review.
Mr. Sylvestre, who owns a gun and sporting goods store in Bonnyville, Alta., compared Ms. Smith’s actions on Thursday with her politically fatal blunder in 2014, when she was the leader of the Wildrose Party. She and eight opposition MLAs crossed the floor to the governing Progressive Conservatives, which the electorate subsequently shoved out of power in the 2015 election.
“We’re going to react,” Mr. Sylvestre said, though he declined to detail strategy. “We’re going to react strongly.”
Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation and Mikisew Cree First Nation, which successfully challenged Mr. Sylvestre’s efforts in court, said they asked the provincial government to consult with them earlier this month but never heard back.
“We will not stand down,” the pair said in a letter dated May 21.
In her bid for the UCP leadership in 2022 and in the general election the following year, Ms. Smith campaigned on a promise to push back against what she characterized as Ottawa’s constitutional overreach. She never mentioned secession.
But last year, as angst toward Ottawa from the right flank of her party grew, her government lowered the threshold for citizen-led petitions to force questions onto a provincial referendum ballot. The UCP also changed the rules to allow petitions in support of proposed questions to proceed without Elections Alberta first approving the constitutionality of the questions. That revision happened in late 2025, just as a court rejected Mr. Sylvestre’s first bid to launch a petition in support of a separation question.
Last week, another judge threw out Mr. Sylvestre’s second attempt at forcing an independence question, ruling that the government must consult with First Nations before approving a proposed referendum question that would affect treaty rights.
Mr. Sylvestre said roughly 301,000 Albertans had signed his petition for an independence referendum.
Ms. Smith said Alberta will appeal the judge’s decision and called the court’s ruling “erroneous” and one that “interferes with the democratic rights of hundreds of thousands of Albertans.”
Corey Hogan, one of two federal Liberal Party MPs in Alberta, pushed back at Ms. Smith’s logic Thursday evening.
“She is willfully ignoring the will of the vast majority of Albertans who want no part of this separatist conversation,” he said in a statement on social media. “She has pushed along a question because a group has threatened to bring down her and her party if she does not.
“Her internal political problems have become our national crisis.”